Try-Qwen-AI.com aims to correct material errors promptly and transparently.
Correction principle: we update a page when the evidence shows that it is inaccurate, misleading, materially incomplete, or outdated. We do not remove accurate criticism merely because a company or reader dislikes it.
What You Can Report
- An incorrect model name, Model ID, specification, limit, price, date, or region.
- A statement that no longer matches current official documentation.
- A broken or misrepresented source.
- A calculation error.
- A screenshot or interface description that is mislabeled.
- A test result that cannot be reproduced under the stated setup.
- A misleading distinction between Qwen Studio, QwenCloud, Model Studio, Qwen Code, a third-party provider, or a self-hosted model.
- A typographical, grammar, accessibility, or formatting problem.
- An undisclosed conflict or commercial relationship.
How to Submit a Correction
Use the Contact page or email [email protected] with the subject line Correction Request.
Please include:
- The page URL.
- The section heading or quoted sentence.
- What you believe is wrong.
- The correct information.
- A primary source or reproducible evidence.
- The date, region, Model ID, provider, or version when relevant.
- Whether the issue creates a safety, privacy, legal, or financial risk.
Review Process
- We confirm that the report identifies a specific, reviewable claim.
- We check the cited source, its authority, date, and scope.
- We compare the claim with other relevant primary sources.
- For test claims, we review the recorded environment and may attempt to reproduce the result.
- We decide whether the page needs no change, a minor edit, a material correction, a clarification, or a broader update.
- We update the page and its verification date when appropriate.
- We reply when the submitter provided a valid contact method and a response is useful.
Minor Edits
Minor edits include spelling, grammar, formatting, link repairs, clearer wording that does not change the meaning, and small accessibility improvements.
Minor edits may be made without a public correction note.
Material Corrections
A correction is material when the previous wording could meaningfully change a reader’s decision or understanding. Examples include:
- The wrong price or billing unit.
- The wrong context or output limit.
- An incorrect deprecation or migration date.
- A false statement that a product is official, free, private, open source, or available in a region.
- A test conclusion based on the wrong Model ID or configuration.
- A security or privacy statement that understates risk.
- A comparison winner that changes after correcting the data.
Material corrections may include a visible note explaining what changed and when. The page’s dateModified should also be updated.
Updates Are Not Always Corrections
A product can change after a page was accurate. Adding a new model, current price, app version, or feature is normally an update rather than an admission that the original page was wrong.
Where readers could otherwise confuse the old and new states, the page should identify the change date or preserve historical context.
Disputed Claims
A disagreement does not automatically establish an error. We consider:
- Whether the source applies to the same product, model, region, plan, protocol, and date.
- Whether the statement is a factual claim or clearly labeled analysis.
- Whether an official source conflicts with another official source.
- Whether a test is reproducible under the published setup.
- Whether the request attempts to remove accurate negative information.
When reliable sources remain in conflict, we may revise the page to present the disagreement and explain what cannot be established.
Corrections Requested by Companies
Alibaba, Qwen, a competitor, a provider, an advertiser, or another company may submit evidence like any other reader. Company status does not guarantee acceptance or rejection.
We may ask for a public source that readers can verify. Confidential evidence can inform an investigation, but we will not publish a claim that readers cannot evaluate without explaining the limitation.
Removal Requests
We generally correct inaccurate content rather than remove an entire accurate page. Removal may be appropriate for:
- Personal data published without a valid reason.
- Copyrighted material that should not have been reproduced.
- A security secret or active credential.
- Content that creates an immediate safety risk.
- A page that cannot be corrected without remaining misleading.
Legal and privacy requests should identify the relevant jurisdiction, right, URL, and material. They are reviewed separately from ordinary factual corrections.
Response Times
We aim to review urgent security, privacy, or materially harmful reports as quickly as practical. Ordinary corrections are normally reviewed within 10 business days, but complex tests, archived sources, or conflicting official documentation may require more time.
No Payment Required
Readers do not need to pay to request a correction. Advertisers and commercial partners do not receive a private correction standard.
Correction History
Where a material change affects the article’s conclusion, the page may include a correction or update note. We do not promise to publish a complete public log of every wording or formatting edit.
Appeal or Additional Evidence
If a correction request is declined, the submitter may send additional primary evidence or clarify the scope. Repeated messages without new evidence may not receive separate responses.
Last updated: August 23, 2026.